+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 57 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 562

Thread: Wire Directional Radios!

  1. #111
    Wirererer philxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northampton, England
    Posts
    372

    Default

    awesome
    pleased to hear it!
    do you have an approximate release month yet?
    (obv you wont have a release date/time yet!! )[/b]
    That depends how complicated certain bits get / how many times I refactor it to perfection

    I would hesitate to give a release date other than "hopefully in the Q4 2007 timeframe". It will largely also depend on Erkle's release date for Wire 2.


  2. #112
    Aut
    Aut is offline
    Wire Amateur Aut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Well then, I hope it's SUPER EXTREME AWESOME CAKE SAUCE

  3. #113
    Wirererer philxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northampton, England
    Posts
    372

    Default

    I am to implement all the features I described as being final earlier in this thread for v1.0.0

  4. #114
    Wirererer SamPerson12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    277

    Default

    Heh... once this comes out I'm gonna wire a yagi to a beacon sensor to relay coordinates to an automated turret in space!
    I code best at 3 A.M.

  5. #115
    Wire Sofaking -=Fox=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Somewhere in my Mind...
    Posts
    1,846
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    I'm going to make an AM/FM data radio (if it has TX/RX Power detection and dynamic Frequency setting)
    http://tiny.cc/OMFGWTFBBQ

    Best People On Wiremod!

    Black Phoenix, Azrael, Jat Goodwin, Magos Mechanicus, ITSBTH, Fizyk, g33v3s,tuusita, InfectiousFight, ief015

    Pointless things that are pointless, are pointlessly pointless, therefore pointlessness is pointless.
    So pointlessly pointing out the pointlessness of this pointless signature is utterly pointless.
    My IQ is 123

  6. #116
    Wirererer philxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northampton, England
    Posts
    372

    Default

    That will lag like mad under the current design because every time you change the frequency, you force a re-polling of the channels and lots of table operations. It's more designed to take a frequency that you want to use, and stick to it. I don't want to make it too crazily functional

  7. #117
    Wire Sofaking -=Fox=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Somewhere in my Mind...
    Posts
    1,846
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    That will lag like mad under the current design because every time you change the frequency, you force a re-polling of the channels and lots of table operations. It's more designed to take a frequency that you want to use, and stick to it. I don't want to make it too crazily functional [/b]

    Ah.. can you dynamically change the transmit power and detect that without having to re-poll stuff?
    http://tiny.cc/OMFGWTFBBQ

    Best People On Wiremod!

    Black Phoenix, Azrael, Jat Goodwin, Magos Mechanicus, ITSBTH, Fizyk, g33v3s,tuusita, InfectiousFight, ief015

    Pointless things that are pointless, are pointlessly pointless, therefore pointlessness is pointless.
    So pointlessly pointing out the pointlessness of this pointless signature is utterly pointless.
    My IQ is 123

  8. #118
    Wirererer philxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northampton, England
    Posts
    372

    Default

    Well, as far as i know, a big difference between wire and wire2 is that code only has to execute when something changes. Although this approach changes the functionality of some things (like the difference between the delta chip calculation and its expression gate variant), I do like the fact it eliminates the constant polling.

    I plan to have a table laid out in a similar way to this:

    Code:
    antennae = {
    **{ basefreq = 15, pol = "H", vector = {0.886, 0.212, -0.13}, pos = {356.04, -134.211, 0.057}, rot = {1, 1, 1, 1}, dB = 16.2, wireval = 1.617}
    **{ basefreq = 170, pol = "X", vector = {-0.412, 0.82, -0.919}, pos = {356.04, -134.211, 0.057}, rot = {1, 1, 1, 1}, dB = 35.8, wireval = 1.820}
    }
    So, each time the frequency is changed, it forces a change that requires other antennae to know about. This makes sense of course, it's the right thing to do, but it will obviously operate more slowly than just sticking to one frequency.

    That said, it can't get to be any worse than continual polling which is what wire1 does now anyway, and when a value is changed, depending on the parameters in the table, other receiving stations will have to be notified anyway.

    In short, don't worry about it, we have to change the wireval all the time anyway to transmit something. But be aware that more code will need to execute in this situation because it needs to rediscover who can sense the signal on the new block of 8 frequencies.

    The above is quite rough because I'm still working on it and thinking about this too, but it's more or less how it will be done.

    Ooh, something changed.... Who does it affect?.... Set the new value....

    rather than

    Has something changed?
    If yes, set it
    Has something changed?
    If yes, set it
    Has something changed?
    If yes, set it
    Has something changed?
    If yes, set it
    Has something changed?
    If yes, set it
    Has something changed?
    If yes, set it
    etc

  9. #119
    Wire Noob Modulator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    17

    Thumbs down

    Hey! I think it's the time for summary of finished features! It's been _long_ time and i can't wait
    Newbie Wireller

  10. #120
    Wirererer philxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northampton, England
    Posts
    372

    Default

    It has been a long time, but I'm still here checking the thread in the short term while I've been juggling a lot of things like selling my car and filling in stupid tax forms and as such, I'm not as far along yet as I hoped. But all being well, you'll see something cool before the end of December.

    But don't hold me to it because despite my best guesses, other people and other situations tend to demand things of me at short notice which take up my valuable coding time!



    I've been finishing off the models, basically.

    You'll see it when it's done, I certainly haven't forgotton you guys, don't worry

    I check this thread nearly daily.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 57 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast

LinkBacks (?)

  1. 06-11-2010, 03:06 PM
  2. 02-28-2010, 10:44 AM
  3. 01-28-2010, 12:07 PM

Similar Threads

  1. Are Wire Radios Retarted?
    By LфяÐ ZZ† in forum Wiremod General Chat
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-05-2009, 10:29 PM
  2. Bi Directional wire wheel
    By Tango in forum Wiremod General Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-30-2008, 06:29 PM
  3. Key boards and wire directional radios
    By woo482 in forum Installation and Malfunctions Support
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-25-2008, 04:56 PM
  4. Two way radios
    By Captain Maim in forum Installation and Malfunctions Support
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 02:53 AM
  5. Advanced radios
    By ace1313 in forum Ideas & Suggestions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-14-2007, 09:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
proceed-collector
proceed-collector
proceed-collector
proceed-collector
linguistic-parrots
linguistic-parrots
linguistic-parrots
linguistic-parrots