Expression Gate

[XeonXT]

So we're basically married by now

I will certainly be trying this first chance on my server tomorrow

[Syranide]

Just released beta 2 which contains many minor improvements and fixes to the component itself, and also cleaned up the code a whole lot although there is still left to clean up.

[Tad2020]

Just released beta 2 which contains many minor improvements and fixes to the component itself, and also cleaned up the code a whole lot although there is still left to clean up.[/b]

Released where?

[Syranide]

Released where?[/b]

It's just under the title of the thread (with red text now )

[martijnve]

Ive just tried it, and i LOVE it.
I rebuilt a couple of my contraptions in in a fraction of the time it took me to build gate or cpu versions.

[Tad2020]

It's just under the title of the thread (with red text now ) [/b]

I must have been blind.

[Syranide]

Ive just tried it, and i LOVE it.
I rebuilt a couple of my contraptions in in a fraction of the time it took me to build gate or cpu versions.[/b]

I'm glad that you like it! Just remember that it is still beta and I know for sure that if you load a saved game it will not work... I'm working on it but I'm not exactly sure what causes it at the moment. And I will probably make one box for inputs and outputs instead of a construct.

BETA 3 is in the works too, some fixes to the menu, real naming convention, so it is now properly called a GATE instead of a CHIP, better descriptions etc... better code and slightly faster (although it is already more than fast enough). Also shows which files you can load, although I haven't quite figured out yet how to use the listbox for input. You will also be able to name your chip when creating it (also saved) so you will have a small hint of what it actually does when "deployed" (yes I know there is a namer, but it is "too much work" to normally use). And some more stuff And I might add memory or arrays soon to so you can do some even more advanced stuff.

[Neotracer]

i dont know if i should post this to bug section but the cos and sin dosnt work as expectet.

i tried this program:
[ W -> X Y ]
X = cos(W)
Y = sin(W)

if w input is 180
x=-57.296 (should be -1)
y=0

if w is 60
x=28,648 (should be 0,5)
y=49,62 (should be 0,866)

so the result is everytime 57.296 times greater when it should be.
but its easy to fix by dividing the result by this value. (maybe only on my pc ?)

[Syranide]

i dont know if i should post this to bug section but the cos and sin dosnt work as expectet.

i tried this program:
[ W -> X Y ]
X = cos(W)
Y = sin(W)

if w input is 180
x=-57.296 (should be -1)
y=0

if w is 60
x=28,648 (should be 0,5)
y=49,62 (should be 0,866)

so the result is everytime 57.296 times greater when it should be.
but its easy to fix by dividing the result by this value. (maybe only on my pc ?)[/b]

No that's probably my fault, I'll look into it and it'll be fixed in BETA3 that should be coming tonight or tomorrow.
Thank you! I just checked the code and yes it is my fault, I mistakedly try to turn the output from sin back into degrees . Temporary workaround should be to just do rad(sin(180)) (the rad).

EDIT: I'd like to tease you with a an improvement to the coding and that is that there is now a function that removes all empty lines and splits all lines with a | (vertical bar) .. so you won't have to cut and paste any more, just add a | and click process and there will be a new line.

[XeononyX]

good stuff if there were gold stars I would give you one.