what? did the post before my previous post bypass your sarcasm detector?
JatGoodwin
McLovin
-HP-
Drunkie
Divran
I'm going to have to stick with my previous sentiment.
<Anticept>Will sex for food.
<Beer>peanus, I like that
<nath2008uk>I must play with black peanus
<Jat Goodwin>i like the underage one
<Black Phoenix>He's a good pedo
what? did the post before my previous post bypass your sarcasm detector?
You can put my name in 2 Analogy's.
This way.
Or the other..
and i dont want to show you the other picture
HAHAH
WAH_LAH!
<Anticept>Will sex for food.
<Beer>peanus, I like that
<nath2008uk>I must play with black peanus
<Jat Goodwin>i like the underage one
<Black Phoenix>He's a good pedo
Well if you see the -Typical FP reply
Or something like that.
You have to get used to sarcasm with meh
Now, go eat some baby seals
mmm
Well, I wouldn't go around shouting that at people.
OR would I?
D:
Chinese stock markets banana milkshake seal
And you claim to have a higher IQ than facepunch...
<Anticept>Will sex for food.
<Beer>peanus, I like that
<nath2008uk>I must play with black peanus
<Jat Goodwin>i like the underage one
<Black Phoenix>He's a good pedo
Just did the Free IQ Test - Fast, Free and Accurate Online IQ Test thing... got over 160.
![]()
<Anticept>Will sex for food.
<Beer>peanus, I like that
<nath2008uk>I must play with black peanus
<Jat Goodwin>i like the underage one
<Black Phoenix>He's a good pedo
Well done.
Now, it's not my fault you don't believe in lulz, but this is the internet, this is the off-topic section, this IS the thread of junk.
And none of it is srsbsns at all.
So.
My post earlier, was a common reply from most facepunch users in alot of threads.
Win
Now.
stop ruining the NON SERIOUS thread and
VS
Apple
Discuss11111
Bookmarks