you didn't screw up, it's not a real waveform![]()
It's not your pulse by definition because that it not possible (the pulse is too small and doesn't occur), so I just messed with it a little and gave upis that bottom right one pulse? crap i DID screw that up .S Ah well pulse isn't a real waveform anyway[/b]so it was me who "screwed up" so to speak.
you didn't screw up, it's not a real waveform![]()
Ow nice one Syranide, somebody just needs to make real-world use of it now!I felt the urge to try them out!![]()
[attachment=240:waveform.JPG]
EDIT: when are they going to fix the screens so they display all the way out :/[/b]
God alone knows why i thought that a waveform generator might be needed, just occured that life maybe easy (less lag) with one rather than not![]()
I don't really see the difference between a waveform generator and the expression gate, but maybe that's just me.
a waveform generator generates those patterns on the screens.I don't really see the difference between a waveform generator and the expression gate, but maybe that's just me.[/b]
the expression gate can also create waveforms as it supports the same mathematical functions
so you can create a waveform generator using the expression gate.
but using a multi purpose gate to fill the requirement of such gates is a bad reason not to have the requirement filled.
I see your point: gate = single function, but if this where treated less as a low-level function and more like a high level function then this implemented as a "expression gate" chip seems entirely appropriate.but using a multi purpose gate to fill the requirement of such gates is a bad reason not to have the requirement filled.[/b]
PS: The term "expression gate" is a curious as this object by definition is general purpose so surely it's an "expression chip"?
actually a waveform chip is something you would expect to see as a vital component of oh say... a synthesizer? Just off the top of my head?
I mean frankly speaking, a waveform is a very basic form of information. So a waveform generator takes a value and turns it into another form of information, just like a regular gate should! Seems very appropriate if you ask me
As I've understood the main difference between a gate and a chip is dependent/(in)dependent execution and no internal states/internal states (also a gate always returns the same outputs for the same inputs because of this?)... so yes by true definition it is a chip, because it has internal states, but as far as I know in every other way it is a gate, and I wanted it to be treated like one, therefore I chose to keep it to "gate" (as it also is its primary function). (This is also mentioned in the documentation to clarify its purpose).I see your point: gate = single function, but if this where treated less as a low-level function and more like a high level function then this implemented as a "expression gate" chip seems entirely appropriate.
PS: The term "expression gate" is a curious as this object by definition is general purpose so surely it's an "expression chip"?[/b]
That is, if you remove "session variables" (internal states) from the expression gate it is a gate by definition I believe, and session variables are only meant as an additional powerful tool as it really is useful, but was not intended to "define" the purpose of the gate.
Bookmarks