Hmm...so it appears then, that if I want an interrupt to be activated immediately when a certain button is pressed, there must be an outside device to check the button status and then deliver the interrupt through the NMI input?
Hmm...so it appears then, that if I want an interrupt to be activated immediately when a certain button is pressed, there must be an outside device to check the button status and then deliver the interrupt through the NMI input?
Well obviously...but then the interrupt code wouldn't be executed until the program actually reached the point in execution where it checked the button. And then, how is that any different from a regular Call?
^ 51mbps Fiber ftw[03:32] <ITSBOT> lua serializing function to be
intergrated into xbox live
[03:34] <ITSBOT> no girlfriend for a pineapple under the Channels
Interrupts have one advantage over calls: you don't need to know address of call method.
Shouldn't that be Int_Table and not InIt_Table ?mov edi,init_table// This is so we can do stuff inside the table
Connect with WIREMOD.
- sloganizer.net
Full time nerd, ASM lover, Wire Enthusiast.
I know this is a bit of a necro-post BUT! I've been trying to get interrupts to work and the above code compiles and doesn't appear to be working.
Did something change for the CPU?
http://tiny.cc/OMFGWTFBBQ
Best People On Wiremod!
Black Phoenix, Azrael, Jat Goodwin, Magos Mechanicus, ITSBTH, Fizyk, g33v3s,tuusita, InfectiousFight, ief015
Pointless things that are pointless, are pointlessly pointless, therefore pointlessness is pointless.
So pointlessly pointing out the pointlessness of this pointless signature is utterly pointless.
My IQ is 123
Bookmarks